Page 4. Pliny’s Glass Recipe
(Plinius Secundus Maior, 23/24 – 79 n. Chr.)
Pliny
reports a glass recipe as follows (Naturalis Historia 36, 189-204):
194
Haec
fuit antiqua ratio vitri. iam vero et in Volturno amne Italiae harena alba nascens
sex milium passuum litore inter Cumas atque Liternum, qua mollissima est, pila
molave teritur. dein miscetur iii partibus nitri pondere vel mensura ac liquata
in alias fornaces transfunditur. ibi fit massa quae vocatur hammonitrum atque
haec recoquitur et fit vitrum purum ac massa vitri candidi. …
Translation
(according to Loeb, Pliny VIII):
This was
the old method of producing glass. Now, however, in Italy too a white sand
which forms in the River Volturno is found along 6 miles of the seashore between
Cuma and Literno. Whereever it is softest, it is taken to be ground in a mortar
or mill. Then it is mixed with three parts of soda, either by weight or by
measure, and after being fused is taken in its molten state to other furnaces.
There it forms a lump known in Greek as “sand-soda”. This is again melted and
forms pure glass, and is indeed a lump of clear colourless glass.
Until now
all editors (with one exception, see below) interpreted these sentences
spontaneously in such a way that three parts (= ¾) of soda have to be mixed
with one part of sand (= ¼) to give 4/4 parts of mixture. The problem of this
interpretation is that this mixture doesn’t lead to a solid glass but only to
watersoluble water-glass. The recipe of Pliny therefore was regarded as being
wrong, also because he did not mention the addition of lime which is necessary
for producing an usuable glass.
The author
of this site pointed out that according to many published analysis results
Roman glass contains 65 – 73 % of silica. He analysed sand of the bank of River
Volturno and found a calcium carbonate content of 24 % (a certain calcium
content had to be expected because of the geological situation of the
landscape). If you assume a sand addition of ¾ = 9/12 according to the old Roman
weight system based on 12: 12 unciae = 1 libra, you will obtain a good glass
with a silica content of approx.70 %, the accurate value depending on the sand
actually used.
The
interpretation that Pliny meant twelfths when saying parts was published already
by W. Froehner (La verrerie antique (1879), 27), but his idea was not taken
into account.
The Pliny
Group editing Pliny’s Naturalis Historia accepted the author’s proposal to come
back to Froehner’s interpretation. The Pliny edition 2000 of the group (R. C.
A. Rottlaender (Ed.), Plinius Secundus d. Ae., Ueber Glas und Metalle. Uebersetzt
und kommentiert von der Projektgruppe Plinius. St. Katharinen 2000) therefore speaks of
Pliny’s parts as twelfths (= unciae).
In this way
archaeochemistry solved an old philological problem.